Andrew Mullins

Product Designer

Back

Calendars.

A comparative usability analysis of the Apple and Google calendar apps on iOS.

Scope
UX Research & Statistical Analysis
/
Team
Solo
/
Duration
4 months
/
Platform
iOS
The Apple Calendar app on an iPhone
Apple Calendar
The Google Calendar app on an iPhone
Google Calendar
/ Overview(01)

Which mobile calendar is actually more user-friendly?

As a student frustrated by calendar usability, I formally analyzed Google Calendar and compared it with Apple’s Calendar for a UX research course. The goal was to determine which was more user-friendly using a mix of UX research methods to identify usability issues.

Four iPhone users participated in remote experiments over Discord mobile screen-share, with data collected and analyzed in Google Sheets. Despite predicting Apple’s native advantage, I hypothesized that Google’s iOS Calendar would be the more user-friendly application, given its higher monthly usage.

/ Experiment 1(02)

Basic scheduling: creating a recurring event.

Participants created a recurring “Psychology 101” event for specific days and times with reminders. I hypothesized Google would achieve higher task success and require less completion time. Neither held: task success showed no significant difference (α = 0.65), nor did time on task (α = 0.41).

Both apps proved equally problematic. Users struggled to set multi-day recurring events — particularly not recognizing they needed to select “weekly” before choosing specific days. My recommendation: display a row of the seven days of the week as buttons that can each be selected or deselected, alongside the existing options.

Chart comparing task success rates between the two calendars
Chart comparing time on task between the two calendars
Summary of usability issues identified in experiment one
/ Experiment 2(03)

Multi-user scheduling: inviting guests to a meeting.

Participants created a “Meeting” for March 29 at 3:00pm EST, invited a guest by email, and indicated a Zoom preference. I hypothesized Apple would have more unique usability issues and lower satisfaction — but found no significant difference in unique issues (α = 0.25), Semantic Differential satisfaction (α = 0.92), or After-Scenario Questionnaire satisfaction (α = 0.90).

Users preferred Google’s visual design yet reported lower overall satisfaction; Apple offered less functionality but users appreciated its simplicity. Both apps confused guest search (users searched by name when emails were required) and timezone selection (no simple EST/PST abbreviations), and Apple’s missing invite function had no explanatory messaging.

Apple Semantic Differential Scale results
Apple Calendar
Google Semantic Differential Scale results
Google Calendar
Apple After-Scenario Questionnaire results
Apple Calendar
Google After-Scenario Questionnaire results
Google Calendar
/ Experiment 3(04)

Calendar views: creating and navigating sub-calendars.

Participants created “Work” and “Play” calendars, then viewed both in December 2021’s monthly view. Apple’s positive-to-negative comment ratio (2:0) far exceeded Google’s (1:5). Google Calendar lacks iOS functionality for creating new calendars, and its time navigation and view-switching (day/week/month/year) proved unintuitive.

Apple behavioural comment analysis
Apple Calendar
Google behavioural comment analysis
Google Calendar
/ Conclusion(05)

Apple wins on the quality of what exists.

Google Calendar scored a combined usability of 43.7% to Apple’s 39.4%. Though this supported my initial hypothesis favoring Google, I argue Apple’s Calendar was superior — its usability flaws mostly result from missing features, whereas Google’s had issues with existing features.

On bias: I may have overestimated mobile calendar capabilities given my predominantly desktop-based usage, but I maintain reasonable expectations for what a modern mobile calendar should do.